Marquette Wire

Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






WASHINGTON D.C. — As Republicans and Democrats nationwide get ready for this November’s midterm congressional elections, six state-level districting fights are forecasting large changes in the American political map.

In an infrequent move, a federal three-judge panel ruled that Wisconsin’s current legislative district map violates the Constitution. A federal court has not done that in more than 30 years. 

Wisconsin legislators chose to appeal that decision, which sends it to the United States Supreme Court.

The practice of drawing congressional district lines within a state to disproportionately favor one political party is known as gerrymandering.

Wisconsin is one of six states whose congressional districts will likely have to be redrawn because the lower courts have ruled they are gerrymandered.  The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide the case by June. 

Some of the six states have cases making their way through state-level courts, while other cases have resulted in court-mandated redrawing of district lines.

These decisions will produce maps not only for this year but lay the groundwork for what they will look like after the 2020 census. This could shape what Congress looks like for the next decade. 

Outside the U.S. Supreme Court.

Maryland, one of the six states, has oral arguments scheduled for March 28, as proceedings were halted by a federal judge until the outcome of Wisconsin’s case is decided. The court is expected to hear arguments from Texas in April.

The Supreme Court will consider taking up arguments from North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Michigan once the aforementioned states cases are decided. The Supreme Court is hearing these cases because the states decided to appeal lower federal court rulings.

In Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court denied an emergency appeal to Republicans after the State Supreme Court struck down the GOP-drawn 2011 map. The court ordered the current Republican majority state legislature to redraw the districts by Feb. 9, with Democratic Governor Tom Wolf having until Feb. 15 to sign off on the new map. 

Wolf said the map submitted to him was just as gerrymandered as the old one, tossing the decision to the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court to draw the districts. The court is expected to release a map Monday. If the state Republicans appeal, it would result in the case going to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Here’s a map of how the states voted in the 2016 presidential election, and a map of which states stand to have their districts redrawn. Five out of six of the states who have cases headed to the Supreme Court went red in the last election. Maryland, the one state who went blue that is also facing a gerrymandering case, is the only case where a Democratic legislature is accused of drawing districts in their favor. Graphic by Clara Janzen.

States that face Supreme Court mandated re-districting. Graphic by Clara Janzen.

State district lines can have a huge effect on state legislatures and the United States Congress. State legislatures of the party in power draw the district lines in their states most often, and a few states have non-partisan committees who draw them. 

The panel decided that by imposing a three-part test. They considered whether Republicans acted with discriminatory intent, if they acted with discriminatory effect or if there were other reasons, such as geography, that made the map to look that way.

The state argued on the third question, saying that Democrats are concentrated geographically in cities.

The three-judge panel disagreed, and said that “does not explain adequately the sizable disparate effect.” The panel concluded that the state GOP acted with both discriminatory intent and effect.

In Wisconsin, Democrats won a majority of statewide votes for the state legislature in 2012 and in 2014, but only hold 39 of the 99 seats. Percentage-wise, Democrats won over 50 percent of the statewide votes, but hold just under 40 percent of the seats. The state’s districts were drawn by Republicans.

An interactive district map shows hardly distinguishable lines in Milwaukee and Madison areas. Contrastingly, the Northwestern districts are easy to see. The court held that this was intentional.

The large gap between Democrats’ votes versus their seats in the state legislature is the reason Wisconsin finds itself at the focus of the U.S. Supreme Court, while other states stand by ready to present their arguments.

Supreme Court decisions would only further exacerbate the Republican struggle to hang onto a congressional majority in the 2018 elections.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment

One Response to “Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering”

  1. Paula Francis on May 14th, 2018 9:55 am

    This map is incorrect in at least one state. Nevada went for Clinton in 2016.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    Students gather to commemorate Hurricane Maria anniversary

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    Near West Side area receives $1.3M HUD grant

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    Students learn to register to vote with Milwaukee organizations

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    New Law School poll shows Evers, Baldwin leading

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    17 years later, Marquette community remembers Sept. 11

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Higher Education

    Student expelled after spring semester photo controversy

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Higher Education

    Wisconsin Supreme Court rules in McAdams’ favor, remands case back to Circuit Court to award damages

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Metro & Politics

    New numbers released from Marquette Law School Poll

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Journal

    Fight against gun violence continues after March for Our Lives

  • Analysis: US Supreme Court considers Wisconsin gerrymandering

    Crime & Safety

    Jane Doe legal team to file motion to compel documents