The student news site of Marquette University

Marquette Wire

The student news site of Marquette University

Marquette Wire

The student news site of Marquette University

Marquette Wire

EDITORIAL: LGBT programs lack promotion

It has been almost a year since Marquette offered Jodi O’Brien the dean position for the College of Arts & Sciences only to withdraw the proposal later because of her research on gay sexuality.

The aftermath has left the Marquette community still struggling to repair the damage done by the incident. While the O’Brien debacle has prompted discussion among students, faculty, administration and staff on how to move forward from the situation, much progress still has to be made in order to prove Marquette is making a substantial effort to fix the problems brought to light last spring.

First off, we want to see more transparency when it comes to Marquette’s efforts to improve after last spring and to create a more welcoming and open environment for those who identify as LGBT.

Ronni Sanlo, a former professor at UCLA and LGBT activist who made a visit to Marquette last October, is an example of the university’s subpar efforts to keep members of the community informed on these issues. Little mention was made about Sanlo’s visit last year.

Sanlo held discussions with students, faculty, staff and administrators in order to assemble a report presenting concerns and recommendations for addressing sexual orientation and gender identity issues on campus.

Sanlo’s report is something that many at Marquette would have great interest in, but the report wasn’t announced on University News Briefs until final exams week last semester, which is often the busiest time of year for many people on campus. During the hustle and bustle of that week, the mention of Sanlo’s completed report could be easily overlooked while reading the news briefs.

And beyond that instance, there seemed to be a concerning lack of campus-wide publicity of the report by the university.

Even worse, access to the report has been very limited. Certainly, it’s good that the document is available to students, but the university has only made it available in the Office of the Provost or the Office of Student Affairs. Everyone deserves to have easy access to the full 31-page report because it is a critical part of the dialogue and healing process.

Marquette could easily put a dowloadable PDF of the report on the university’s website. We ask them to do so immediately.

That way anyone, even those who aren’t on campus or directly connected to Marquette can view the report. It would be a simple step toward improving transparency. It would also show more acknowledgment by the university of its weaknesses in these areas. By allowing anyone to access the full report online, the Marquette community can better evaluate the university’s progress.

There is a variety of specific programs and projects the university enacted this year, with more to be introduced next year. LGBT awareness week, LGBT Respect Life month, an LGBT Orientation Welcome Reception, The Ally Program and observance of the Day of Silence are all solid initiatives from the university, but these events need to be better publicized so more people are aware of them.

Judy Shepard’s appearance and the performances of “The Laramie Project” earlier this month were two events tied to LGBT issues that received a lot of advertising and promotion around campus and, as a result, ended up with large turnouts. Shepard’s event was so popular that many were turned away because the Weasler Auditorium reached capacity moments after opening.

Clearly, students have an interest in attending LGBT programming on campus and are receptive to these events when they are publicized effectively. Marquette needs to continue to promote these initiatives and keep members of the community updated about its progress.

No matter how many LGBT events the university has, transparency and getting the word out are essential to the programming’s success and Marquette’s overall progress in moving forward.

Story continues below advertisement
View Comments (5)

Comments (5)

All Marquette Wire Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • M

    MiguelMar 30, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    Philosophically you are right. But you made the choice to go to MU and you should have known it was catholic. Complain all you want but if you are unhappy, you are mostly to blame for choosing to attend this school.

    Reply
  • J

    JennMar 28, 2011 at 6:50 am

    Justin,

    Good points. I am wondering where do genetically intersexed people fit in. Those born with even numbers of chromosomes more than 46…i.e 48, 50, 52 that are 1/2 male and 1/2 female.

    Reply
  • J

    JustinMar 26, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    I’m a non-practicing Catholic but one that still respects the Church. I understand disagreement with the Church. A thinking human should question even if in the end he or she must submit in faith. That faith – like trust in a woman one loves – can be a virtue.

    And let me say I’m as sinful as they come. I don’t say that lightly.

    But as both a biology major at UW-Milwaukee and person decently read on the history of the Church and reared Catholic I have a question. And bear in mind I have extended members of family that identify as homosexual and are fundamentally good people.

    But given Catholic sexual teachings on heterosexual promiscuity to homosexual sex, why is there a need for an LGBT awareness week at MU?

    Political ideology is always attempting to force itself into somewhere. It did it in the early 1900’s with the Eugenics Movement glorified by political liberals. The Church was mocked for opposing that too.

    There is no scientific reason to search for genes that encode proteins for homosexuality, but not for bisexuality, pedophilia, or male attraction to pre-op transsexuals, or even male attraction to Eurocentric beauty standards. And if in fact homosexuality or pedophilia are genetically inherited then it’s reasonable to presume most or all humans carry recessive genes for one or both.

    If attraction to pre-pubescent boys or girls is genetically inheritable, does that mean Catholic teaching and societal objections are wrong? Why not have a NAMBLA awareness week?

    And that’s not to suggest NAMBLA and orthodox homosexuality are one and the same. They’re not. But my query simply has to do with what philosophical weight we place on possible genetic inheritance for human sexual traits.

    And do I really need to ask college students to use critical thinking about how they reconcile feminists rhetoric about “femininity,” female gender clothing, mannerisms, and dolls with the contradiction in a girl being trapped in a boys body because the child enjoys the above from early childhood?

    Reply
  • J

    Jeff EngelMar 25, 2011 at 10:21 pm

    Dear Desiree,

    Thanks for the feedback. Here’s a link to the full PDF of the report:

    http://marquettetribune.org/files/2011/03/Ronni-Sanlo-report.pdf

    Obviously, even though the Tribune has provided the link to readers of our website (which we also included in a recent story: http://marquettetribune.org/2011/03/03/news/sanlo-wpo1-tm2-dac3/) our request to have the university post a full PDF on its website still stands.

    -Jeff Engel, editor-in-chief

    Reply
  • D

    DesireeMar 24, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    Right on!

    I too hated the fact that the newsbrief just happened to fall on the week before break and without any link to an online pdf of the report. Perhaps the Trib could post a pdf?

    Reply