The Archdiocese of Omaha has permanently removed a Jesuit priest, Rev. Perry Robinson, from public ministry on an allegation that he engaged in inappropriate conduct with a Marquette University High School student in the early 1980s.
Archbishop George Lucas removed Robinson, 69, from St. Gerald Catholic Church in Ralston, Neb., where he had served since 1989, after receiving a letter from the MUHS alumnus last month. The letter said Robinson had given the student an inappropriate back rub in high school and pointed out Robinson’s involvement in an early 1990s controversy, which found him in possession of several nude photographs of MUHS students.
Daniel Sheehan, the now-deceased archbishop at that time, was unaware of Robinson’s past when hiring him, according to Tim McNeil, chancellor of the Archdiocese of Omaha. Upon receiving the letter, Lucas immediately removed Robinson in keeping with the archdiocese’s “zero-tolerance” policy toward sexual abuse.
McNeil also said the Jesuits performed an immediate investigation upon receiving news of Robinson’s release. During the investigation, St. Gerald parish notified parishioners in a bulletin that Robinson was leaving on sabbatical for health reasons and would not be returning.
Weeks later, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests issued a press release describing Robinson’s termination. It was not until this time that the archdiocese notified parishioners of Robinson’s sexual misconduct, saying the delay was to protect children and the reputation of clergy.
“It’s a delicate balance between people’s right to know and the clergy’s right to a good name,” McNeil said.
John Pilmaier, SNAP Wisconsin director, has been working with the organization since 2007 in an effort to make clergy sexual abuse cases more transparent. He also helped compose a March 17 letter to the Rev. Tom Krettek, Provincial of the Wisconsin Province of the Society of Jesus, asking him to make information public regarding Robinson and any other Jesuits accused of sexual abuse.
Current Wisconsin Province policy requires an investigation following any credible abuse report and cooperation with civil authorities. However, unlike the Catholic dioceses, the Jesuits do not publish a list of the accused clergy, as they are a separate religious order.
“None of the religious orders have been transparent on sex offenders,” Pilmaier said. “They’re keeping a lid on it.”
He also said religious orders make up more than 50 percent of clergy in parishes, schools and hospitals.
Rory Gillespie, director of communications for the province, believes the current policy to address abuse cases is sufficient.
“We actively encourage victims to report abuse, and we will handle cases seriously,” he said.
When asked why the Archdiocese of Omaha was not aware of Robinson’s past misconduct, Gillespie refused to comment.
Pilmaier doubts Archbishop Lucas knew nothing of Robinson’s history and believes if parishioners had been informed from the beginning, they would not have allowed their children to be in Robinson’s presence.
“The system is fundamentally flawed and broken,” Pilmaier said. “The problem is the archaic structure of the church itself, with bishops having absolute control.”
McNeil, however, believes the church has made huge strides since the Boston abuse scandals in 2002, mentioning that every diocese now has a review board.
“We’re still not there yet, but I think we’re really, really close,” he said.
In the past eight years, the Archdiocese of Omaha has implemented safe environment training programs for approximately 20,000 adults and 36,000 young people in its schools and programs, a press release said.
In the meantime, Pilmaier and SNAP continue to wait for a Jesuit response.
“We are certainly willing to have that conversation to ensure children are safe around Jesuits,” he said.
Justin • Mar 26, 2011 at 5:13 pm
Kay, what “wealth (power)”?
A person’s name is to protected, in the context of balancing and weighing need for the community and the guilty. Due process is to be respected too. The notion of “justice” as unforgiving, unrelenting, torment inflicted by judges or lynch mobs is a United Statesian view of “justice.” Priests are not the only ones called to mercy or forgiveness. Lest one forget, more than one Priest has heard the confession of lay Catholics guilty of things broad in range of gravity, to include murder and incest I would suspect.
The Church – the Jesuits – have a remarkable history. The Church is made up of saints and sinners, however, and pastoral leadership in the Church can make mistakes at times. The Bishops made a mistake in thinking Catholicism was so assimilated in the United States that its enemies would not mount major attacks on it for agreements other United Statesians have long done behind closed doors with lawyers. Like Michael Jackson for instance. United Statesians love Michael Jackson even though he paid millions to keep a child silent. MJ was innocent to many United Statesians because he was a great father that was a mentally a small child. As a grown man I’m expected to ignore the oxymoron in that. But not to get off into red herrings. MJ is not the issue. May he rest in peace.
The Church must stand. It is in need of an Inquisition. But more than anything it needs to call on its Mother: The Holy Virgin Mary. Her love for her son will rescue the Church.
Some teenage boys likely were intimidated into sexual encounters they did not want. Meaning they were not bisexual, homosexual, nor inquisitive about sexual experience with a man let alone a Priest. Some teenage boys – by all odds – probably were inquisitive and far from Catholic in their hearts and minds. I say that having listened as a teenager in high school during the 1980’s some other teenage boys brag about taking their shirts off for photos for a Priest. In exchange for alcohol I believe. I recall the tone of their voices. No victims they were. Manipulative, corrupted teens, yes. The Priest of course being equally manipulative and corrupted.
Kay4Justice, you have Jesuits that are medical doctors and Ph.D.’s in mathematics, physics, history, cosmology, law and so on. Contrary to what you may think they are not materially “wealthy” as individuals. How many Ph.D.’s or medical doctors you know vow celibacy, give up large salaries, and give up a future to grow old with a wife and enjoy grandchildren?
To the Jesuits past and present, from the Reductions of Latin America to Oregon Country and China, Semper Fi.
Kay4Justice • Mar 24, 2011 at 11:02 pm
How much longer will we have to wait until these “men of god” do the right thing and admit to their obvious conspiracy of silence in order to protect themselves and their wealth (power)? Probably forever. In the interim, please do not trust your children to these ‘shepherds’ as they have zero credibility. Their system is broken and is a problem that they themselves created. Their review boards dysfunction, please report any known (or suspicion of abuse to civil authorities. They believe themselves to be above the law and above God’s law. Their “god” is not my God.
Judy Jones • Mar 24, 2011 at 6:57 pm
quoted:
“It’s a delicate balance between people’s right to know and the clergy’s right to a good name,” McNeil said.”
McNeil, if you call this statement/action “CLOSE”? You are definitely going backwards.
We urge anyone who has knowledge or may have been harmed by Robinson or anyone in the Archdiocese of Omaha, to contact police, not church officials. Sex crimes, however old, should be investigated by the independent professionals in law enforcement, not the biased amateurs in church offices.
This brave victim is to be commended for speaking up and taking action to expose the truth about being sexually abused. This is not an easy thing to do, yet keep in mind your silence only hurts, but by speaking up there is a chance for healing, exposing the truth, and therefore protecting others.
Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, 636-433-2511
[email protected]
“Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests”
http://www.snapnetwork.org/