Marquette Wire

BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






President Donald Trump made an accusation that Facebook was out to get him in September. At the same time, many liberals have called out the social media site for helping grow and expand Trump’s campaign.

Those who are right-winged often accuse social media sites of being too liberal and favoring leftist views. They claim the sites silence free speech. In reality, the content being pushed out from these sources are deeply offensive and inflammatory. Social media outlets like Twitter have the right to take action to protect the general public from abuse. These claims also include sites like Facebook along with Twitter. This perception is in fact not true.

Forty-five percent of all adults from the United States say they get their news from Facebook. This places pressure to deliver well-informed and equal information for both sides of the political spectrum.

In actuality, NewsWhip data found that the popular outlets on Facebook are much more heavily conservative than they are liberal. Even though it may not be the intent of the company, Facebook allows sites like Conservative Tribune and American Military News to go viral much easier over other already reputable and recognizable news sources. This means the places with more left-leaning information do not have equal weight and strength as conservative ones. The bias affects the opinions of the public using Facebook which has an impact on the United States voters who then decide on the country’s political state.

For the claim on the silencing of free speech, social media users must understand they are using sites owned by a company. Yes, the people have the right to say what they want, but the company has the ability to restrict or suspend the hurtful actions of one user upon another.

There are certain instances where a Twitter account suspension is completely acceptable. In July 2017, actress and comedian Leslie Jones was attacked with racial and sexist comment by Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos. He wrote intense harassment against Jones surrounding the time of the “Ghostbusters” remake debut. Twitter said,

“People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter. But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online, and our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.”

This was a clear and simple violation of the Twitter rules presented to each of its users.

There were many twitter accounts suspended or warned of suspension during the Twitter “cleansing.” This was in response to the criticism of allowing fake, misleading and hateful information due to Russian interference. Both Google and Facebook also faced similar criticism because they were a target for professional and illegal propaganda operation run by the Kremlin.

Because of the chaos around this issue, Twitter had to deal with a large number of accounts that were linked to this Russian interference. The social media site was doing what it could to reduce fake news that had a link to conservative accounts.

These types of comments that spew hate speech should not be accepted or allowed. It infringes on the safety of groups in the public. Without Twitter suspending these malicious accounts, it would make it seem as if what they are saying should be suitable to the general public in environments outside the internet.

Not all Twitter cases are so directly hateful and so clear that they should not be allowed. This is for the instances which are obviously cruel and uncalled for which lead conservatives to perceive that there is an anti-conservative bias overall.

This opinion also goes for the liberal side of Twitter. If left-leaning accounts are making similar remarks of harassment because of one’s race, sexuality, gender or anything similar, they should be dealt with in the same manner.

Malicious remarks of any kind cannot be perpetuated and tolerated by sites like Twitter or Facebook. These sites combined are responsible for over 2 billion active accounts. These 2 billion people must have an equal opportunity to explore outlets across the entire political spectrum. They all also must be accounted for in the case of hate speech.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the Writer
Aminah Beg, Columnist

Aminah Beg is an opinions columnist for the Marquette Wire. She is a sophomore from Naperville, Illinois who is majoring in Public Relations and Cognitive...

3 Comments

3 Responses to “BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias”

  1. Jim Pere on April 26th, 2018 1:10 pm

    I’m sure that this Author (or anyone else for that matter) would be hard-pressed to find someone to disagree with the fact that an overwhelming amount of our news intake is not in some way influenced by sites like Facebook, and twitter. Although in the end it is up to us, as rational human beings to make up our minds for ourselves. While the Author and I may have different interpretations of what is “offensive & inflammatory” I sure that we could both agree on two points. First, nearly everything being said online is protected by the first amendment (for better or worse). Second, both sides of the political spectrum participate in “offensive & inflammatory” remarks. Weather it is a comedian holding up the severed head of our president, or people making fun of Secretary Clinton’s speculated health issues.

    This that being said I feel we should be graded against using sites which claim neutrality such as NewsWhip. NewsWhip can hardly be considered an unbiased source of information when one of its principle donors is the NDRC (National Democratic Redistricting Committee (source listed below)). Regardless of what a source such as NewsWhip states, at the end of the day, and after reading how ever many number of news articles from whatever sources we choose, we will end up listening to the leaders that w look-up to. In an article from Times (source below) which lists the top 25 most influential people on the internet ten of them are strongly Liberal, and a mere two are conservative (with thirteen being a-political). Now in an age where bloggers and Instagram artists are strongly political and a majority are liberal can we honestly make the claim that the internet is “more heavily conservative”?

    Lets be honest with ourselves, we may read or watch things on the internet that sway our opinion on political matters, but in the end isn’t it up to us to decide weather or not we would like to vote for person A or B? Yes the “Kremlin may very well have published or promoted content on the internet to persuade one opinion over another. Isn’t that the difference between us and computers, we as humans should be able to rationalize the facts. Even if Russia did publish propaganda (which any American could have done) it is still our responsibility to vote with our heart, and gut.

  2. Jim Pere on April 26th, 2018 1:53 pm
  3. Jon Schuster on August 19th, 2018 7:10 pm

    The more I hear opinions like this the more I realize that these people have an axe to grind right out of the starting gate. With them it’s all subjective.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Editorials

    EDITORIAL: Residence hall policies for break periods alienate students

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    HARTE: Early morning classes harmful to learning

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    KORENICH: Prison health care reforms needed

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    BEG: Continued use of N-word perpetuates consequences

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Featured

    NITSCHKE: Linguistic diversity enriches US culture

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    BEG: Trump reiterates dangerous anti-immigrant rhetoric

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    HARTE: Lower drinking age proposals contain various risks

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Editorials

    EDITORIAL: Civic engagement not limited to voting booth

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    BEG: Corporations must be held environmentally accountable

  • BEG: Social media does not have liberal bias

    Opinions

    HIMMELBERG: Liberal arts education overshadowed by STEM programs

Navigate Right