Marquette Wire

MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Photo by J. Matthew Serafin/mathew.serafin@marquette.edu

Photo by J. Matthew Serafin/mathew.serafin@marquette.edu

Marquette Student Government presidential and executive vice presidential candidates debated in the Alumni Memorial Union ballrooms Sunday, offering their positions on student inclusivity, student organization funding and diversity, among other issues.

The three candidates are all active MUSG vice presidents. Executive Vice President Zach Bowman, a junior in the College of Arts & Sciences, appeared with his running mate Marguerite Biagi, a junior in the College of Arts & Sciences. Legislative Vice President Kyle Whelton, a junior in the College of Arts & Sciences, was with his running mate Natalie Pinkney, a junior in the College of Arts & Sciences. Programs Vice President Tyler Tucky, a junior in the College of Arts & Sciences, appeared with his running mate Rosie De Luca, a junior in the College of Business Administration.

During the debate, candidates spoke on issues like student participation on search committees, SOF and other financial policies, diversity and academic issues. The candidates held many of the same positions on major issues, including a belief that there should be a student on administrative search committees, and that there is a need for SOF process is in need of reform. The primary differences between the candidates’ platforms were in implementation of ideas, where the three tickets provided differing plans on how to approach reserve fund growth and how to reform SOF.

All the tickets shared differing view on the debate. Tucky and De Luca shared the details of their platform for the first time during the debate, allowing them to talk in specifics about how they would lead MUSG.

“I think it went really well,” Tucky said. “I think that we were able to preach our platform for the majority of it.”

Whelton and Pinkney also considered the debate was a success.

“I thought it was a really productive discussion,” Whelton said. “I think (the debate) is going to focus the students more on the issues.”

Bowman and Biagi shared a different perspective on the debate. Bowman said that he does not believe the debate will have a large affect on the outcome of the election.

“I believe the people in this room have already made their decision (on who to vote for),” Bowman said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    HARTE: High drug prices need adjustment

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    HARTE: District lines in WI need redrawing

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Editorials

    EDITORIAL: Change in immunization requirements would benefit MU

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    LIPO: Women’s March lacking inclusion

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    HARTE: Government shutdown negatively impacts universities

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    HARTE: Republican power grab suppresses voters’ interests

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    BEG: Celebrity opinions affect public

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    HARTE: Title IX proposal would decrease misconduct reporting

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Editorials

    EDITORIAL: Residence hall policies for break periods alienate students

  • MUSG presidential candidates debate campus issues

    Featured

    NITSCHKE: Linguistic diversity enriches US culture

Navigate Right